- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 50
Posted by "Peter Nguyen" <petern82@HOTMAIL.COM> on Wed, 01 Mar 2000 18:03:31 GMT
Dear Francois,
Brilliant email there about Sgt Raskul‘s ranting and raving. He ought to go
to school and learn a little about politics, history and geopolitics. First,
you can‘t have a bloody army the size of the US, it‘s useless. Our job in
Canada in a realistic context is to help out the authorities, secure our
borders, but we‘re not in danger of seeing anyone walk into our country to
fight. The C-7 rifle, with its reputation to foul, is still a good weapon.
Raskul proposed the AK-47, get a life buddy, we‘re not an eastern country,
if he knows what I mean by eastern country. Our choppers are not worth crap,
I‘m talking aobut the Griffon, and our tanks are old yes, but we don‘t need
anymore tanks, we should convert to wheeled armored vehicules for our
purposes. Do you think it would be brillinat to roll around in tracked tanks
in Bosnia? Nah, that‘s a ridiculous proposition. The US attacking us, where
did you get such an idea? Like Francois said, stop reading those korny
mercenary magazines they sell. Hmmmm, anyone have input on the new combat
uniform? I find it good, but perhaps a little too aggressive for "garrisson"
duties.
Peter Nguyen, 714th Comm. Squadron, Sherbrooke, Quebec
>From: "F. A."
>Reply-To: army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>To: army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>Subject: Re: weapons
>Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:44:05 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [207.236.3.189] by hotmail.com 3.2 with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBA85ED7C0010D82197A0CFEC03BD1BFF0 Tue Feb 29 20:54:26 2000
>Received: from majordomo@localhost by
>cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com 8.8.4/8.8.4 id AAA06806 for army-outgoing
>Wed, 1 Mar 2000 00:41:10 -0500
>Received: from priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net edtnes12.telus.net
>[199.185.220.112] by cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com 8.8.4/8.8.4
>with ESMTP id AAA06803 for Wed, 1 Mar 2000
>00:41:01 -0500
>Received: from telusplanet.net [161.184.103.66] by
>priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net InterMail vM.4.01.02.11
>201-229-116-111 with ESMTP id
>
> for Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:45:13 -0700
>From owner-army@cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com Tue Feb 29 20:54:52 2000
>X-Authentication-Warning: cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com: majordomo set sender
>to owner-army@cipherlogic.on.ca using -f
>Message-ID:
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] Win98 I
>X-Accept-Language: en
>References:
>Sender: owner-army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>Precedence: bulk
>
>
>er... you‘re kidding, right? The C7 sucks...why? Yep the Browning .50 cal
>is
>old, know anything just as good? As dependable? The reason its still
>around is
>because it is that good. Know anyone who has walked away after being hit by
>it?
>Didnt think so. Our tanks were only 115mm 115mm what? They have a 105mm
>gun,
>if thats what you were talking about. Unfit soldiers? Are you a little
>confused
>or just angry? Do we even compare to an African Army? Me thinks you havent
>seen
>African troops. Were a just wee bit better trained and equipped thats
>humour. As for the US ever wanting to invade us, you may want to enrol in
>a
>history and/or political history class at your local community college.
>Youll
>find it quite enlightening. And please, do yourself a favour and try using
>a
>little better grammar. And quit reading those damn SOF magazines! -
>
>
>Best regards
>
>Francois Arseneault
>
>
>
>"sgt. RASKUL" wrote:
>
> > i think that the new budget should be totaly going to the army to
>improve
> > its weapons. we cant depended on the US or UK all the time. i think
>canada
> > needs new infantry rifles. the C7 sucks. why cant we go and bye M16A1 or
>A2,
> > even M4. i think an ak-47 does better. if we cant afford thosei woudent
>be
> > surprised theres always the RPM or even the STYRE. the browning .50cal
>is
> > kind of getting old and do we even have sniper rifles?our tanks suck,
>last
> > time i checked they were only 115mm. i think my mini van can take a hit
>from
> > the leo. our choppers suck, so do our planes the only thing that goes
>for us
> > is the rec. and troop training. but what good is rec. if when we find
>them
> > we cant destroy them. does the CAF even have special forces or
>rangersnot
> > the ones up North, do we even compare to say any African army. probably
> > not. you say Canada will never get into a war, thats probably true, but
>if
> > we do, and the NATO doesnt help us we are dead. isnt good to live in a
> > country that has military might not a bunch of unfit soldiers.China
>probably
> > has more pilots then we do infantry.what we need is a war to get our
>troops
> > more skilled and so that they can teach and maybe if people hear that we
> > kicked another countrys *** , they might want to join. every war we
>fought we
> > wonexcept when we tried to invade the USwe can probably beat the US.
>WE
> > do have a better army then the Viet-Kong so we can probably win,
>everytime
> > we train with the US we beat them in skirmishes,but these are little
> > exercises that dont involve mush might. if the US would try to invade
>us,
> > they would total destroy us because of the following reasons.
> >
> > 1.we dont have enough troops
> > 2.we dont have enough tanks and they suck anyways
> > 3.our troops are out ranged by the M16 and out powered by better
>artillery
> > 4.we are out planed and they have better planes then us.
> > 5.they have a navy ten times bigger then us
> > 6.and they have better special forces that can wipe canada out.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> > to majordomo@cipherlogic.on.ca from the account you wish
> > to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
> > message body.
>>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to majordomo@cipherlogic.on.ca from the account you wish
to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
message body.
Dear Francois,
Brilliant email there about Sgt Raskul‘s ranting and raving. He ought to go
to school and learn a little about politics, history and geopolitics. First,
you can‘t have a bloody army the size of the US, it‘s useless. Our job in
Canada in a realistic context is to help out the authorities, secure our
borders, but we‘re not in danger of seeing anyone walk into our country to
fight. The C-7 rifle, with its reputation to foul, is still a good weapon.
Raskul proposed the AK-47, get a life buddy, we‘re not an eastern country,
if he knows what I mean by eastern country. Our choppers are not worth crap,
I‘m talking aobut the Griffon, and our tanks are old yes, but we don‘t need
anymore tanks, we should convert to wheeled armored vehicules for our
purposes. Do you think it would be brillinat to roll around in tracked tanks
in Bosnia? Nah, that‘s a ridiculous proposition. The US attacking us, where
did you get such an idea? Like Francois said, stop reading those korny
mercenary magazines they sell. Hmmmm, anyone have input on the new combat
uniform? I find it good, but perhaps a little too aggressive for "garrisson"
duties.
Peter Nguyen, 714th Comm. Squadron, Sherbrooke, Quebec
>From: "F. A."
>Reply-To: army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>To: army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>Subject: Re: weapons
>Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:44:05 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [207.236.3.189] by hotmail.com 3.2 with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBA85ED7C0010D82197A0CFEC03BD1BFF0 Tue Feb 29 20:54:26 2000
>Received: from majordomo@localhost by
>cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com 8.8.4/8.8.4 id AAA06806 for army-outgoing
>Wed, 1 Mar 2000 00:41:10 -0500
>Received: from priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net edtnes12.telus.net
>[199.185.220.112] by cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com 8.8.4/8.8.4
>with ESMTP id AAA06803 for Wed, 1 Mar 2000
>00:41:01 -0500
>Received: from telusplanet.net [161.184.103.66] by
>priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net InterMail vM.4.01.02.11
>201-229-116-111 with ESMTP id
>
> for Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:45:13 -0700
>From owner-army@cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com Tue Feb 29 20:54:52 2000
>X-Authentication-Warning: cpu2212.adsl.bellglobal.com: majordomo set sender
>to owner-army@cipherlogic.on.ca using -f
>Message-ID:
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] Win98 I
>X-Accept-Language: en
>References:
>Sender: owner-army@cipherlogic.on.ca
>Precedence: bulk
>
>
>er... you‘re kidding, right? The C7 sucks...why? Yep the Browning .50 cal
>is
>old, know anything just as good? As dependable? The reason its still
>around is
>because it is that good. Know anyone who has walked away after being hit by
>it?
>Didnt think so. Our tanks were only 115mm 115mm what? They have a 105mm
>gun,
>if thats what you were talking about. Unfit soldiers? Are you a little
>confused
>or just angry? Do we even compare to an African Army? Me thinks you havent
>seen
>African troops. Were a just wee bit better trained and equipped thats
>humour. As for the US ever wanting to invade us, you may want to enrol in
>a
>history and/or political history class at your local community college.
>Youll
>find it quite enlightening. And please, do yourself a favour and try using
>a
>little better grammar. And quit reading those damn SOF magazines! -
>
>
>Best regards
>
>Francois Arseneault
>
>
>
>"sgt. RASKUL" wrote:
>
> > i think that the new budget should be totaly going to the army to
>improve
> > its weapons. we cant depended on the US or UK all the time. i think
>canada
> > needs new infantry rifles. the C7 sucks. why cant we go and bye M16A1 or
>A2,
> > even M4. i think an ak-47 does better. if we cant afford thosei woudent
>be
> > surprised theres always the RPM or even the STYRE. the browning .50cal
>is
> > kind of getting old and do we even have sniper rifles?our tanks suck,
>last
> > time i checked they were only 115mm. i think my mini van can take a hit
>from
> > the leo. our choppers suck, so do our planes the only thing that goes
>for us
> > is the rec. and troop training. but what good is rec. if when we find
>them
> > we cant destroy them. does the CAF even have special forces or
>rangersnot
> > the ones up North, do we even compare to say any African army. probably
> > not. you say Canada will never get into a war, thats probably true, but
>if
> > we do, and the NATO doesnt help us we are dead. isnt good to live in a
> > country that has military might not a bunch of unfit soldiers.China
>probably
> > has more pilots then we do infantry.what we need is a war to get our
>troops
> > more skilled and so that they can teach and maybe if people hear that we
> > kicked another countrys *** , they might want to join. every war we
>fought we
> > wonexcept when we tried to invade the USwe can probably beat the US.
>WE
> > do have a better army then the Viet-Kong so we can probably win,
>everytime
> > we train with the US we beat them in skirmishes,but these are little
> > exercises that dont involve mush might. if the US would try to invade
>us,
> > they would total destroy us because of the following reasons.
> >
> > 1.we dont have enough troops
> > 2.we dont have enough tanks and they suck anyways
> > 3.our troops are out ranged by the M16 and out powered by better
>artillery
> > 4.we are out planed and they have better planes then us.
> > 5.they have a navy ten times bigger then us
> > 6.and they have better special forces that can wipe canada out.
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> > to majordomo@cipherlogic.on.ca from the account you wish
> > to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
> > message body.
>>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to majordomo@cipherlogic.on.ca from the account you wish
to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army" in the
message body.
