Search results

Well that makes sense, after all a man known for stiffing his contractors, cheating on every one of his wives, being twice impeached, convicted on 34 felony counts with prosecution on more to come, and who openly sucks up to and admires dictators would never cheat in an election. /sarcasm

or he cheated enough to win, after all according to you there is no way to ensure the system is legitimate. more people voted in 2020 than in past elections, ergo more people voted for the winning candidate. Makes sense especially given who Biden was running against.

so no election in the US has ever been legit? or just the one that Trump lost? If he wins this one how will you prove it's a legit win if the system is not auditable?

He lost the last one. cue complaining about it not being legit even though nobody has been able to prove otherwise Even with the election he did win he still lost the popular vote.

The MBT-70 waves from the past

so you got a problem with citizens voting?, do you want only certain citizens to be allowed to vote?. How would you discriminate between which citizens are allowed to vote and which aren't?

citation needed. she prepared for the debate!, how dare she "clutches pearls, swoons."

they're bad. Are you prepared to say that trump's lies are bad as well?

so thanks for proving the point i made in an earlier post. I gave a rational reason why i don't believe trump's disavowal of project 2025 and you just hand wave it away as "hate".

this is not a court of law, I have no need to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. I've taken trump's past behaviour as a liar and applied it to his statement of disavowal. Add in the various connections between his administration/campaign and project 2025 and i've come to the conclusion...

Oh please, I haven't been posting long but i've been around long enough to see that if i had a video of trump openly endorsing project 2025 you'd hand wave it away. You're the poster child for TDSS.

Yes and he's also claimed the Mexico would pay for the wall, the he didn't have an affair with a porn star, that china has paid the US billions in tariffs, and more recently that children go to school and come back a few days later having had a sex change operation. His denial is worth nothing.

trump says lots of things, most untrue, why should anyone take his disavowal of project 2025 at face value? especially given his connections to it?

your right to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose.

sure it is how mnay of those votes are: A. American voters, 2: real people.

dude if you wanna call her the n-word just say it. She's served as state AG, senator, and vice-president, dismissing her a a DEI hire says more about you than her. Edited to add: JD Vance's only qualification seems to be that he's still limber enough to get down on the floor and lick trumps...

Because it's not like there is video of a project 2025 leader talking about how trump has provided funding for the project and is supportive of it's agenda. https://gizmodo.com/project-2025-author-says-in-leaked-video-that-trump-has-blessed-its-agenda-2000487655

Charges get plead down all the time. Getting your panties in a twist about a Dem getting a plea deal and pretending that a republican wouldn't get one is dis-ingenious at best.

I don't think Meteor is integrated with the F-16

right so the claim that the jury was not required to be unanimous isn't entirely correct. He wasn't being charged with the predicate crimes, ergo they didn't need to be unanimous on them. The jury was unanimous of his guilt on every one of the 34 criminal charges he faced.