Search results

I would prefer a baby steps approach like this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/15/AR2006081501288.html Nobody fully understands the consequences of using remote control fighters.

Another word for a small nuclear reactor that generates 4000MW:  BOMB. It is really impressive that they did this for 12 minutes! Man, nuclear power is evil!

I would hope that the Army doesn't invest its money in such a small niche. This is a very passive tactic. You fight a 100 dollar tactic with millions of dollars? What other roles does this system perform, the Army already does air defence? Isn't there any better ideas?

As a formal naval officer, I do not envy the task of the Army in Afghanistan. While there is always safety considerations when releasing naval weapons, I believe the problem is generally simpler in the Navy. I can not guarantee that such a weapon system would not kill any civilians. I cannot...

56 and 76 need an FCS, I would sugguest: http://www.one35th.com/attc/arthur_main.htm Solution to the larger issues: the system should have one red button that requires a human being to press.

Instead of hitting the motar/artillery rounds, how about sending some fire to the point of origin. The 57 or 76 mm could easily do this ???