Poll

Where do YOU feel the cenotaph's new home should be?

Beechwood Cemetery
9 (25%)
Canadian National War Museum
24 (66.7%)
NDHQ (Nortel Campus)
1 (2.8%)
Elsewhere in Ottawa (post a comment explaining where/why)
2 (5.6%)

Total Members Voted: 34

Voting closed: January 23, 2012, 06:41:33

Author Topic: Where should the monuments come home to?  (Read 44315 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 415,485
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 21,889
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #125 on: December 04, 2015, 06:18:25 »
Note:  To avoid confusion, this story/update is about the separate, stand-alone monument to the mission announced in May 2014 (news release also attached in case link doesn't work), NOT:
Quote
A new military memorial in Ottawa to Canada’s mission in Afghanistan is behind schedule, raising doubts about whether it will be completed as planned for Canada’s sesquicentennial in 2017.

The ministerial briefing book for Canadian Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly describes the memorial as “a high profile commemoration” and says the department plans to launch a national design competition in the fall of 2015.

But Canadian Heritage, which is managing the project on behalf of Veterans Affairs Canada, confirmed this week that no design competition has yet been announced. The department was tight-lipped about the project’s timetable, saying only that further details will be provided “in due course.”

Veteran’s Affairs, the project lead, was similarly vague, saying more information about the memorial and other commemorative initiatives “will be available in the coming months.”

(....)

Beyond the fact that it will be placed at Richmond Landing, on the banks of the Ottawa River just east of the Portage Bridge, very little information about the planned memorial has been revealed publicly.

However, a staff report submitted to an in-camera meeting of the National Capital Commission‘s board of directors last January — released to the Citizen by the NCC this week — contains heretofore secret details about the project, most notably its total budget of up to $5 million.

( .... )

The NCC document also reveals that the Crown corporation’s board considered granting federal land use approval for two different sites for the memorial during its in-camera meeting last January.

In addition to the selected site at Richmond Landing, the staff report also recommended an alternate location: a 1,100-square-metre triangle of land at the western entrance to the Mackenzie King Bridge, surrounded by Elgin, Albert and Slater streets.

NCC staff said the “Mackenzie King Bridge Triangle” site’s elevated position and location would enhance the new memorial’s visibility. The site also has “strong thematic links” to the National War Memorial and several military-themed commemorations in Confederation Park, the submission says.

But the board approved only the Richmond Landing site and deferred consideration of the Mackenzie King bridge site until more information was provided. The issue became moot when Veterans Affairs accepted the Richmond Landing location ....
Curious to hear from folks in the Ottawa area:  how publicly visible is the proposed site vs. the alternate site NCC seemed to consider at Elgin, Albert and Slater streets?  From the graphic in the story, the Richmond Landing site doesn't look all that public or easily accessible.
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Blackadder1916

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 177,180
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,918
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #126 on: May 22, 2019, 19:24:31 »
They've finally decided on a place to put the cenotaph and it didn't turn out to be that good a decision.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/afghanistan-war-memorial-cenotaph-1.5143986
Quote
'An insult': Families of dead soldiers offended at being left out of low-key Afghanistan memorial event

DND says it wanted a 'humble, internal event ... to ensure proper reverence'

Murray Brewster · CBC News · Posted: May 22, 2019 4:00 AM ET | Last Updated: May 22

A number of families who lost loved ones in Afghanistan say they feel betrayed by a decision made by bureaucrats at the Department of National Defence to privately dedicate a memorial last week containing the Kandahar battlefield cenotaph.

The marble and granite cenotaph structure, which stood outside of the Canadian task force headquarters throughout the war, was a focal point for soldiers who had lost comrades and families when they came on military-sponsored visits.

A special building — built behind the security cordon at the new DND headquarters in Kanata, in western Ottawa — was opened and dedicated on May 13 in a private ceremony. News of the dedication ceremony only became public in a social media post three days afterwards.

Families were not invited and were only informed of the event by letter.

"I wasn't given that opportunity to go to that event, but none of us were," said Anne Snyder. Her son, Capt. Jonathan Snyder, a Star of Military Valour recipient, died in 2008. "It's kind of an insult."

Errol Cushley, whose son Pte. William Cushley was killed in 2006, described how the department handled the situation as "shoddy" and said he would have made the trip to Ottawa from his southern Ontario home had he been invited.

"It seems like we're an embarrassment to them," said Cushley.

Closed to the public

DND's social media post last week said the memorial would not be open to the public — but families of slain soldiers could book appointments to see it when they're in Ottawa.

The defence department took half a step back from that approach on Tuesday, saying it was looking to "accommodate special visits by the public on appropriate occasions." DND still insists it's not possible to open the memorial up to the public completely.

"When I hear stupid things like that, yeah ... I get upset pretty easily," said Raynald Bouthillier. He lost his son, Trooper Jack Bouthillier, to a roadside bomb in 2009.

"If they can organize tours of the White House, don't tell me they can't organize something there."

The cenotaph — portions of which were displayed on Parliament Hill six years ago and subsequently toured the country — includes 192 black granite plates etched with the photographs of Canadian soldiers and civilians killed during the decade-long conflict, as well as those of Americans who died while under Canadian command in Kandahar.

A proposal by the previous Conservative government to create a lasting, public memorial to Afghanistan remains mired in bureaucratic disagreements among four different departments and agencies.

In light of that, Bouthillier said, it's more important than ever for Canadian civilians to have a specific place to remember the soldiers who fought in the Afghan war.

"They were willing to die for this country," said Bouthillier. "So why can't the general public go and see their faces and remember those guys? You know, for me, Remembrance Day is not once a year."

Jean-Marc Doucet, a National Defence official and acting director of transformation at the department's Ottawa headquarters, told CBC News last summer the initial plan was to allow the general public to visit the memorial, but "the process, procedures and guidelines are still being worked on."

'Proper reverence'

DND was asked Tuesday why the decision was made to hold the cenotaph dedication in private. The department responded in an email.

"Given the solemnity of the memorial and to ensure a dignified, dedication service, a quiet, limited service was held in honour of those we have lost," said the statement. "The decision to hold a humble, internal event was made by senior leadership to ensure proper reverence."

The department said it waited to post news of the event on social media "in order to ensure correspondence with the families of our fallen had sufficient time to be delivered."

Cushley said he never received his letter.

Successive federal governments have struggled to find an appropriate tribute to the over 40,000 troops who served during the brutal counter-insurgency war. Five years ago, the governing Conservatives held a ceremony on Parliament Hill with the families of the 158 Canadians who were killed in the conflict.

Planning for that event happened at the last minute, however — and there was confusion about whether relatives were expected to pick up the cost.

The Conservatives carved the dates of the Afghan conflict into the national war memorial, but promised a separate, permanent remembrance.

Bureaucratic wrangling

Documents obtained by CBC News under access to information legislation show that getting Veterans Affairs, Canadian Heritage, the National Capital Commission and the Canadian War Museum to agree on a site — after the first one was deemed unacceptable — has been a tortured process.

The records show that there is a consensus on a location — a patch of land east of the Canadian War Museum in Ottawa. But the various agencies "have not received further direction from [Veterans Affairs] on the next steps for this project," said an Oct. 28, 2018 briefing note.

Cushley said memorializing the war and the sacrifices that were part of it clearly hasn't been a priority for the Liberal government.

"They've let a lot of things with the military slip through the cracks with all the stuff they promised, including to veterans," he said.

Whisky for the gentlemen that like it. And for the gentlemen that don't like it - Whisky.

Offline Cloud Cover

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 37,960
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,055
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #127 on: May 23, 2019, 01:59:51 »
Comment added to reflect my vote in the poll:

Other: Currently sourcing NCR land with easy and convenient access to all and investigating options to create a park setting that will also house the KAF Monument. I believe that is what they will eventually decide to go with.

Nortel: Although an option, I hear that access may be impeded for families who wish to visit (along with your average everyday Canadians as well) due to the campus' distance from the downtown core.

CWM/Beechwood: I hear this isn't happening either as this war is not over yet --- 2014 until our Canadian folks are all back home.


Talk is that the Monument will go into LTS until suitable NCR land can be found; it has already been deconstructed here, is crated up and is being escorted back. I can perhaps find some of the TF photos of it's deconstruction.


Why is RMC getting any attention for a location still? It certainly shouldn't be --- Read about 5 posts down the statement from the MND stating that it would be going to Ottawa.

The rest of you can vote as you wish, but I'm sticking with my vote  ...   ;)

Good call on the misfire.
Living the lean life

Offline Jarnhamar

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 288,681
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,785
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #128 on: May 23, 2019, 07:01:42 »
Top soldier admits handling of Kandahar memorial 'hit a nerve;' vows access

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/top-soldier-admits-handling-of-kandahar-memorial-hit-a-nerve-vows-access/ar-AABKw7M


Can't seem to cut and past.
Some of my favorite quotes from our top soldier.

"To ensure a dignified dedication service, a quiet, limited service was held in honour of those we lost "

"It was a beautiful ceremony but it was absent the families and the wounded"

And the knuckle biter on keeping it where it is..

"There's a certain elegance to that, because it's a constant reminder for those who work in the headquarters.... of the perils of war and the need to make good decisions around the committal of troops"
There are no wolves on Fenris

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 108,140
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,259
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #129 on: May 23, 2019, 07:44:37 »
Given the difficulty of working with the anything in the NCR, ie NCC, City of Ottawa, GoC etc etc, someone probably thought this was the easiest route. 

I would imagine that the difficulty of finding the space and ensuring the upkeep and maintenance (someone has to pay for it) etc etc factored into a course of action that looked good on paper...but failed to take into account the people who had the more vested interest in this. 

To me the war museum would have been a no brainer and appropriate.  Easy access, open to the public and would those people that otherwise might have had a bit of ignorance in regards to Afghanistan.
Optio

Online FSTO

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 48,825
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,758
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #130 on: May 23, 2019, 08:10:12 »
"There's a certain elegance to that, because it's a constant reminder for those who work in the headquarters.... of the perils of war and the need to make good decisions around the committal of troops"
Maybe. Once the neverending landscaping is complete. Or the building will be locked at all times.

I expect it to be moved due to the brooha this all caused. Repurposing the building and moving the monument will cost close to what a 3 story parkade would have cost at Carling.

Offline daftandbarmy

  • Army.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 238,990
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 13,506
  • The Older I Get, The Better I Was
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #131 on: May 23, 2019, 09:34:41 »
To me the war museum would have been a no brainer and appropriate.  Easy access, open to the public and would those people that otherwise might have had a bit of ignorance in regards to Afghanistan.

This.  :nod:
"The most important qualification of a soldier is fortitude under fatigue and privation. Courage is only second; hardship, poverty and want are the best school for a soldier." Napoleon

Offline milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 415,485
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 21,889
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #132 on: May 24, 2019, 16:57:36 »
The latest from the CDS (PDF attached in case link doesn't work for you):
Quote
“To our beloved Memorial Cross Families, our honoured Veterans and all Canadians,

“The best of intentions have led to unintended harm. When it comes to the opening last week of the Afghanistan Memorial Hall at the new National Defence Headquarters, we unintentionally went down that path. We owe the family and friends of our Fallen, all who served in Afghanistan, and Canadians an apology for not properly including you and not properly communicating with you. I am truly sorry for our insensitivity and the pain, anger and frustration that this decision caused you. I accept full responsibility for it all.

“You also deserve an explanation, and a changed approach.

“When the monument, once known as the Kandahar Airfield (KAF) Cenotaph, needed a permanent home, we considered several options, but ultimately decided to have it reside within the Headquarters lines on our new campus at Carling.  Our concern was to keep the monument accessible, but also safe from the elements and vandalism, so we decided to protect it within our base in a space custom-designed to house it in a dignified and peaceful setting, where people could pay their respects. We wanted to honour the Fallen – Canadian, U.S., military and civilian – by protecting this legacy of theirs carved in stone. In our Headquarters, it will serve as a daily reminder to us of the true, and ongoing, cost of war: much like it did on the airfield in Kandahar.‎

“We also made this decision to install it within the secured zone of the Headquarters in light of plans to create a publicly accessible National Monument to Canada’s Mission in Afghanistan in Ottawa. This new monument will recognize the commitment and sacrifice of Canadian men and women who served in Afghanistan, as well as the support provided to them by Canadians at home. Our colleagues at Veterans Affairs Canada are working with the Department of Canadian Heritage and the National Capital Commission on this important project and we look forward to standing with them, the families of the Fallen, and our Veterans, on the day of its unveiling and dedication.

“Sadly, in trying to do the right thing by getting the Hall opened quickly so people, especially families of the Fallen, could arrange to visit, we alienated and angered these same people. Importantly, we also utterly failed to communicate the intent to hold an inclusive event in the future, following the opening of the Hall, to properly dedicate the Memorial. To each and to all, we offer our deepest apologies, and ask for forgiveness. We will be seeking input from the families of the Fallen on how best to conduct the dedication.

“More importantly, an apology is meaningless unless the wrong it seeks to address is mitigated, and this is how we will make things right:

“The Afghanistan Memorial Hall will become accessible to all who come and wish to see it. All members of the Canadian Armed Forces and their families can see it whenever they want by presenting their military identification card for access.  While we must balance security and access, know that we have already established a system for personal escorted access to the memorial for the families of the Fallen. Indeed, several families have already reached out to us via the email address established for them: AfghanistanMemorial@forces.gc.ca.

“We are now coordinating their visits. Families and Veterans may also attend the Headquarters, and they will be immediately escorted for a visit. Details for timing will be forthcoming on a website to be launched shortly.

“In the coming month, we will begin providing continuous scheduled visit-opportunities to all who wish to visit, and we encourage you to do so.  This letter will be sent by email or courier to known addresses of the families of the Fallen.  Any family members of our Fallen, military or civilian, who would like to confirm their contact information are invited to contact us at: VisitorAfghanMemorial-visiteurmemorialAfghan@forces.gc.ca

“Canadians entrust us with their security and defence. Families of our Fallen and our Veterans entrust us with the honour of remembrance. Both are our sworn duty. We are a visible symbol around the world of what this great nation represents, and we constantly strive to be worthy of the support you give us, and we must return that support with professionalism in all we strive to do.  That remains our pledge to you.

“Lest we forget.”

- 30 –
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 212,165
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,507
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #133 on: May 24, 2019, 17:16:09 »
Given the difficulty of working with the anything in the NCR, ie NCC, City of Ottawa, GoC etc etc, someone probably thought this was the easiest route. 

I would imagine that the difficulty of finding the space and ensuring the upkeep and maintenance (someone has to pay for it) etc etc factored into a course of action that looked good on paper...but failed to take into account the people who had the more vested interest in this. 

To me the war museum would have been a no brainer and appropriate.  Easy access, open to the public and would those people that otherwise might have had a bit of ignorance in regards to Afghanistan.

That was proposed, and the War Museum said 'no'. They won't errect a memorial to a specific conflict on their grounds, in order to avoid being seen as exclusionary. The public Afghanistan memorial is due to go up on the National Capital Commission lands nearby, but the NCC is notoriously slow to get anything done.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Online kratz

    Spring is still hiding under the covers.

  • Float, Move, Fight
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 262,308
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,312
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #134 on: May 24, 2019, 17:28:01 »
My thoughts, this is where there PAFO machine is chasing the tail.

If they had of issued press releases of the "temporary location" opening, invited a small "representative group" of family, this whole thing event wouldn't have made national news.

That whole transparency ahead of time, not afterwards with questions and hurt feelings.
Quote from: Pipe *General Call*
"Tanning Stations on the flight deck"


Remember, this site is unofficial and privately owned. The site benefits from the presence of current members willing to answer questions.

Offline Jarnhamar

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 288,681
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,785
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #135 on: May 24, 2019, 17:40:56 »
CDS apology- sorry I don't buy it.

To believe that explanation you would have to believe our leaders were too incompetent (I'd say stupid) to realize what the reaction would be from:
1. family of dead service members
2. wounded service members; and
3. the public.

I can't think of anyone who wouldn't have seen this reaction coming or surprised by it.  If our leaders didn't then maybe they shouldn't be planning missions, because this was quite the amateur mistake.

+300
There are no wolves on Fenris

Offline daftandbarmy

  • Army.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 238,990
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 13,506
  • The Older I Get, The Better I Was
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #136 on: May 24, 2019, 21:39:51 »
CDS apology- sorry I don't buy it.

To believe that explanation you would have to believe our leaders were too incompetent (I'd say stupid) to realize what the reaction would be from:
1. family of dead service members
2. wounded service members; and
3. the public.

I can't think of anyone who wouldn't have seen this reaction coming or surprised by it.  If our leaders didn't then maybe they shouldn't be planning missions, because this was quite the amateur mistake.

Five phone calls asking the question 'What do you think?' would have helped....
"The most important qualification of a soldier is fortitude under fatigue and privation. Courage is only second; hardship, poverty and want are the best school for a soldier." Napoleon

Offline milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 415,485
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 21,889
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #137 on: May 30, 2019, 20:37:09 »
The latest ...
Quote
The memorial for those killed in Canada’s mission in Afghanistan at the new Department of Defence headquarters is to open to the public Friday afternoon, the department says.

People who aren’t military members, veterans or their families will have to register for visits in advance and be accompanied by Canadian Forces personnel, the department said Thursday.

Visiting hours will be limited: from 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays and three periods between 9:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays.

The centrepiece of the “Afghanistan Memorial Hall” is the cenotaph that once stood at Kandahar Airfield, a key base for much of Canada’s military and aid effort in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2014. The cenotaph honoured the more than 160 Canadians who died in the Afghanistan mission, on Afghan soil, and the Canadian Forces brought it back when the mission ended.

The department has taken heavy criticism for putting the memorial in the secure zone of its new building in west Ottawa without an immediate plan to allow visitors who don’t work there ...
This, from the Info-machine ...
Quote
The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces have established a system for escorted access to the Afghanistan Memorial Hall for the families of the fallen on a priority basis. These guided visits began on May 26, 2019, and will continue under separate arrangements.

In the meantime, members of the public are also invited to visit the Afghanistan Memorial Hall at the National Defence Headquarters (Carling) in Ottawa, beginning on May 31, 2019, at 3:30 p.m., to honour those who lost their lives during Canada’s mission in Afghanistan.

Individuals wishing to find out more information on visit schedules, registration process and timelines, and contact details may email VisitorAfghanMemorial-VisiteurMemorialAfghan@forces.gc.ca. Please note that members of the public must register in advance.

Canadian Armed Forces personnel will guide each public visit and provide visitors with information on Canada’s military contribution in Afghanistan.

Planning is underway to hold a re-dedication event for the Kandahar Cenotaph in the coming months. Details on this event will be shared as soon as information is available ...
« Last Edit: May 30, 2019, 20:43:50 by milnews.ca »
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Jarnhamar

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 288,681
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,785
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #138 on: May 30, 2019, 22:33:25 »
Not to be a negative Nancy here but how does this reflect on the image of NDHQ personale and work load? We're taking CAF members away from their jobs to randomly escort people around and play tour guide. That's gotta be intrusive and disrupting, no?
Will these be $100,000 a year captains?
There are no wolves on Fenris

Offline garb811

  • MP/MPO Question Answerer
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 81,495
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,547
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #139 on: May 30, 2019, 22:37:45 »
Ceremonial Guard and/or the NSP just got a new duty station...

Offline Colin P

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 140,780
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,415
  • Civilian
    • http://www.pacific.ccg-gcc.gc.ca
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #140 on: May 31, 2019, 11:15:40 »
Class B slots I suppose or even a permanent staff of disabled veterans from Afghanistan?   

Offline garb811

  • MP/MPO Question Answerer
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 81,495
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,547
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #141 on: May 31, 2019, 11:56:54 »
...even a permanent staff of disabled veterans from Afghanistan?
This right here is a brilliant idea IMHO.

Offline Dimsum

    West coast best coast.

  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 174,300
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,128
  • I get paid to travel. I just don't pick where.
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #142 on: May 31, 2019, 12:02:08 »
This right here is a brilliant idea IMHO.

Definitely.  I would totally send that up the chain (if you're military) or suggest it publicly (if not military).
Philip II of Macedon to Spartans (346 BC):  "You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city."

Reply:  "If."

Offline Jarnhamar

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 288,681
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,785
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #143 on: June 11, 2019, 18:43:59 »
I heard the plan for summer is to rotate platoons +/- from Petawawa through Ottawa for a few weeks at a time to play tour guide. That's seems sustainable.
There are no wolves on Fenris

Offline daftandbarmy

  • Army.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 238,990
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 13,506
  • The Older I Get, The Better I Was
Re: Where should the monuments come home to?
« Reply #144 on: June 12, 2019, 00:29:18 »
I heard the plan for summer is to rotate platoons +/- from Petawawa through Ottawa for a few weeks at a time to play tour guide. That's seems sustainable.

... because the combat arms is so flush with troops that there's nowhere to keep them on base, right?  :sarcasm:

:)
"The most important qualification of a soldier is fortitude under fatigue and privation. Courage is only second; hardship, poverty and want are the best school for a soldier." Napoleon